- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old* H. U% P% T% V% s/ M, y' x$ M
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical0 l& G2 d8 d9 n& v8 x) }. m
Exposure to Testosterone
; u4 h7 u0 y9 W, g; [- ]Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
$ R, G) k/ t' f' \0 Aand Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
9 C7 [, a2 h4 Y8 |* IClinical Pediatrics) ?" ~# j/ u$ x P- e! i+ ^
Volume 46 Number 6
i# F) Q( i' A2 E; d4 ?July 2007 540-5436 }- p: d) F- O) t8 N9 L
© 2007 Sage Publications
4 b3 l1 T1 a7 _4 Y10.1177/0009922806296651
+ b7 B- V" V; F/ Ghttp://clp.sagepub.com$ C6 u! f0 S$ c& r- B+ ~. Y# L! T6 D
hosted at
$ U f! T1 Z2 g; Z, E8 khttp://online.sagepub.com
6 f1 Q& F% k. @! `- y6 iPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,/ K/ ~; _- X# i6 |- D9 d
is a significant concern for physicians. Central
4 F7 @* W5 M, o' t. xprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
, w/ o( N1 @, Sthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
- J+ y. G8 B/ V5 n W" F/ Sa higher incidence of organic central nervous system
3 y" }$ d7 k: Y: |lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested
$ z* F1 q8 |, B, k( n1 C8 Lby enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
8 V! |6 o5 ^; \; Shair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-$ ]1 a) ?( x& ^
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We7 _+ F4 j" k2 c4 C$ `
report a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
: N: v: T4 x7 Yenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-7 ~ V( O6 y8 c. C% o
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
7 ^0 m f( g" M& ^/ zto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
2 y) u, n. q" n: H, B8 r: [" mthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-
( `: x7 F2 r. Y) D0 wmation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this: {, q/ J" f* X' x+ ]9 B. {8 a' L$ N
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of
. b1 D8 P8 U6 s, i4 ctestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-# ^0 p2 d* e9 l! U7 {
bly more common than the rare case report in the
6 r1 k1 Z5 n/ Zliterature.4, Z6 t ]. L- p
Patient Report% T4 l' S! f* L' v& r
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the& x3 a& E1 b, `. ^0 s; L) `. a
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
, ]8 l! h4 }: X7 cof early sexual development. His mother noticed
' y4 L- q$ x D. P" Hlight colored pubic hair development when he was( s& q: H0 J K
From the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of( A: M7 B- n8 s8 {' B4 L7 S M
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
$ e: R8 s" ~* `2 s" uAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,6 H2 u6 N: g8 N: L; m- a
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of8 w+ }+ j4 \. L! M
Medicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;
8 N1 o+ s# g2 t. qe-mail: [email protected].+ ~4 a4 Q( n/ ?" Q- g5 V
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became! ~% I+ m! g9 F0 i: g
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
$ u* W1 d8 \: a0 Q0 V0 z9 Gment of his penis and frequent erections. The child
7 J! K4 C' I P9 X9 s7 nwas the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
, O t2 D8 w& h* {. P+ N# Ya birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of* P! s6 a4 O8 n' \+ ^
20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year" q2 T. P" I7 `9 ?8 R; q: P
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with- X; A; \$ M+ u( Q) ~
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,8 z$ O4 Y$ z2 j: J
and his psychosocial and psychomotor development
7 I7 ?9 @0 E; E% H r0 P1 R' _was age appropriate.
' O0 w/ c1 e) a+ d0 ?$ j9 _& t7 mThe family history was remarkable for the father," L1 U2 g$ J1 z* r6 b4 U
who was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
0 u& }" W1 |: p1 Iwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
- u6 b5 U% R+ sheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat
+ U4 J/ q( `- `2 p) D( [early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
# g/ B' v8 E5 X7 \The father denied taking any other medication. The
3 _' L* X/ x1 ]- v# \child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche0 u6 m" z1 v4 L* `) ?- }) f
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet: @- _/ B0 |! |4 \+ T# ^ u
5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
+ o2 ^$ O+ Y: J: S1 k4 T" ]cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
5 C% J& H# V9 s- c$ u4 g! O6 atives. There were no siblings.1 O: \4 t0 l7 j, M8 g
Physical Examination
4 x" b1 L# @: S% T$ \) v DThe physical examination revealed a very active,7 Y! `6 R7 a `( \# e
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented
9 r: s, `( w1 r6 N& Ya blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
/ D, T; d }" a% v/ [90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
2 V6 _' n" l4 z(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth1 a9 S. B# N3 N7 H# J
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
, c1 a& ?/ v$ i( }the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
( T; { {$ b) a' dThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for- d7 R& z" Q) A F$ c
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of& a& T8 R$ \& n% |. |' \
8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
# _( E @4 a: q* }# Pdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around' p1 N( T# {6 N' p1 Y& b
540( @' I+ P% F8 R% z! a9 r( r
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
5 Z2 @$ d; C/ |5 z9 n9 athe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
0 j* m% q H( Y/ P! Ztesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.: C0 p" N# v$ A z( \; `# A
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
. j9 b( q% X$ woily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no- }0 C$ v( S! H. N: G4 J& E
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
' y( K1 W, | hNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+' ]+ |8 _9 L1 p6 {! R/ m
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
# L$ `& Z K" t$ ?$ iof papilledema.
9 ~" D$ L/ O: [) ~; X' a0 M3 }' ?0 b" }Laboratory Evaluation
1 t8 _7 x# D! \9 y' g9 m' AThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
4 G, `% }4 C! O# F) eusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-% V5 B, V: C+ ?; m, t# f
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
8 r; f& Q) i$ j8 s" h6 T3 H% `karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test4 i+ M( p2 S2 s
showed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
1 M( c( B; N; y) h: {0 ^) \) Clating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
+ g/ P$ F+ g, V3 a0 ~0 ?) J/ jThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood7 {8 F5 x( m. ~' w) z; l) a, U
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were) Y" `" L! [% Q/ N) b
within normal range for his age. The concentration1 l* b! m; H, f* t
of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL! i2 M D* i1 k8 @
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 207 q& C+ z5 ` T% d, {! p" ]
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
$ W8 }7 G) d( J; ~terone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),5 z- [7 Y9 U) q( p
desoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to" e( n# Q: N3 a3 j, f" Z0 p
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S)
! D0 E! ~# B" |4 K% T1 h0 Lwas 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-, v" [# a: D0 J# t
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
: y/ H& S o( j, O) b7 Ttestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
i8 n/ `2 R7 k5 a2 q- d1 nand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than' k: n! r' w U, }
5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular# x! V1 g5 H# E8 F
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
N \, N& H8 Iconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL: t( @( l7 Y2 Q9 O, {5 x! N2 ^
(prepubertal).: W3 B7 k8 u8 |- X- G7 y1 J
The parents were notified about the laboratory& I0 b7 H# @8 F* M; P# @/ K+ ]1 n
results and were informed that all of the tests were- ~ U) Y% r9 L2 M |4 C+ d- A
normal except the testosterone level was high. The3 A" {% A" q$ X b
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to9 a% \6 u& D+ J- k9 x
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-% M; Z2 V' c% I( a: B) G, y6 y v4 |
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.
" _# q! e! ~" M, `# yPhysical examination at this time revealed that the# ]1 B2 B0 w) y! ^( K* {
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
1 [8 k. @( C; W2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
8 z. p' ] g# d6 t+ @* p0 C+ V- Zunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com- f" }, N2 G4 ^# |$ G5 z
pletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
. _! c8 n0 ~/ Z* o$ f/ lthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 26 M' t- d. q' t0 |2 p4 r
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
1 N7 c' g% l2 ^' ^, mThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-. [* X) X7 W. R
ing frequent erections.
+ c' `5 O# Y1 z* l# rBoth parents were again questioned about use of: ^! u8 X5 [, b" m- {+ L9 n
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to
% W6 A% f) Z; kthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
9 @# Z' ^( r U A7 [. E7 T- [Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
. y6 C3 h1 N1 N" T4 V5 n. J& fuse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-
+ }6 N2 X; h/ r5 R; qing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
5 a! i7 D' L8 ya year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed! E G3 |" h7 E; h5 R I
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
9 a7 `/ V6 i5 \0 t: Escribed by his family physician for decreased libido
& m; _* M0 j+ \% isecondary to depression.
- d: v) A7 d- O. ^% `; nThe child slept in the same bed with parents.
, X5 _7 T# s) ?1 VThe father would hug the baby and hold him on his
$ S) B2 |. [) Y$ B" r" Y( I+ ychest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-- w2 A- U. I7 I9 Y" p
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
, j3 Q Y+ @6 J) KThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
. I4 G" }; Y- C5 A' W0 Zwhen he learned the testosterone level in the baby; L6 M# H9 Z6 v- Z* w1 z' ~
was high, he then read the product information
: J. Y H* G# x' a7 R/ jpacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
) D# v# |' M5 R V1 sson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they
; ^0 f$ O$ ~8 D8 P+ I# w0 v) i* G6 b7 Vdecided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
4 o/ @2 d; o. lfather was not hugging him with bare skin and had, Y- @+ A' T E, ]! `. x2 }* `$ |
been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
# J& M: f' @* A( ntest was ordered, but the family did not go to the) ~/ d0 D$ m# M8 w, ^
laboratory to obtain the test.5 Q x- m- }5 D5 a) S; o
Discussion# Q: a3 l- F" Z: j; t3 `3 ~8 C
Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
5 u& i8 J( F5 Tsexual development before 9 years of age.1,4
9 n0 ]: C. a- B$ P& \% MPrecocious puberty is termed as central (true) when
; c/ k8 j% S, S2 _7 s0 F" C' H/ ]9 y8 nit is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
* x& C: g5 S! T* X8 v6 \6 pthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-3 \- X3 B4 I% e, d7 H
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP) }6 f9 x# `; {# o/ ]' z! J
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
9 d! x- g) Y7 Cresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-7 K+ r$ Q2 p0 O2 f0 I
amic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-" b' K. o- R) f, m" \8 U$ d7 K+ M
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
" _6 n, [/ Q1 K' `7 s7 Kboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
& b+ J F, f; _( F5 x L& Sization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-0 D0 u$ J, r* K& ~# u/ w$ Y2 H% e
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by
( V: s* s/ z/ ~! b$ R c& E _% n, Agonadotropins.1,3
& G* T5 G9 {. w$ w. u+ bGonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
6 d# v! |# ~- z9 h$ icious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate- S; w3 v1 a( Q- |3 }
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or% _6 ^; V3 \$ G$ O
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-) D' @, f* e7 d. ` f0 E
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing- m) k! |/ t% j; o7 l, ]3 ?
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive" G+ k. P/ E1 o9 N& Q
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
0 @/ V6 a+ {0 ~) `' }puberty in boys.3,4# c3 t0 }/ c7 z: w6 @- Y; N" U
The most common form of congenital adrenal
t$ ]6 V- P: g# Bhyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.' ^: S+ D1 |1 G1 _1 |% x
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in* ~; X+ d& s+ ^- v& ]( P
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
/ S& |' d4 K& z7 M2 P/ t; L' k. L* xan adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen$ e. T9 |/ o: m7 R" {0 ?1 M
excess.1,3
$ M$ r: c8 s0 {! ^9 O" o+ Q, eat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from. U7 A8 k8 d C& J$ c$ h6 F
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007# Z+ j M0 Q7 F6 |! K/ Z
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
u( Q6 f+ o8 ^" i' Iindependent precocious puberty, which is also known7 f8 A. Q2 K; m" L l: v0 { q
as testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a4 Z+ X2 V& ]: o+ n7 y
very young age. The physical findings in these boys: K7 ^' }+ M; ?
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
; z: U6 I, i1 Jincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
# U6 t6 B! O+ u: Y7 `% `) ^; y. mwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
C7 p* o+ j3 V1 kare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show
6 Q Q5 T4 W' p2 m9 spubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-. s& Z+ c& |5 c* \. ?2 ]
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
0 H, {8 x) P9 uautosomal dominant disorder that affects only+ ]2 ~) P) C3 k. M6 z1 j
males; therefore, other male members of the family0 Z& G h- U9 j4 R- U( O$ V
may have similar precocious puberty.3
$ U% X) O/ Y- \% [! S, `In our patient, physical examination was incon-2 x# x3 W0 z' }* g) a3 H/ ~8 y
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-! x% m& W6 I4 b! J
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis" c; Y6 _, Q, G2 X E' k, j
was in the differential diagnosis because his father
6 S1 i' K# {$ W' C" ostarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,5 I1 k2 v# r2 O+ }( J2 k) o: e& L! N8 r
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the% ]! u L( {. L8 p$ j
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-5 T9 v. q% v; g# I3 p$ H3 Q) m8 F
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
# w2 b2 O j2 N8 D$ fbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,3 w. k4 G6 x7 z4 I, D" _# M
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase" y9 R8 K+ `3 ~2 I- c* m+ X/ S9 G3 \ u
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
t( o4 `% o# [( r2 z( A& T0 L" z; ving the normal level of adrenal steroids.# W* \ R- I* Y
The diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly
. b, J6 P0 ^0 P) V$ K* K" Ksuspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
' ~( B# }6 H. h' Cthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-0 O, Y9 P+ @6 O; m4 t, ~
pearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
1 W: p; t; H: C7 Mdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
) }- \* \% N( q6 Q5 y6 dterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
" p7 {$ d/ @8 P: T+ N; Fusing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’ q+ b: }, J0 f. x8 g
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or* @+ ]# i4 ^+ S4 f
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to: X7 n. u5 D9 G" A4 a3 z; ^& K4 `+ B
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.. y; G! H; K) k& ~( N; a
Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the
! V8 \7 \. A% c4 W3 e- y7 L0 S6 gbaseline value in those females who were exposed to& l5 I' ~* c2 n/ j6 D+ R/ W
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male5 {) h- e" W0 f6 H, v( s4 N
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-
9 U$ F9 V' q" F F7 xtion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.( U; \: s+ F2 x6 g
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
8 S; f- c6 A5 p/ L3 }which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that$ h3 M1 l0 ]2 W
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-; l3 s7 {# i7 q9 ?
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
' D1 O" M1 x) z2 ?: M9 J; E9 Wactive in young children exposed to testosterone1 m; b @& C! F
exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-
& e4 T/ G% H0 F! V7 o8 jdrotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
- j5 `8 @. s5 X2 ^0 `7 e0 Pvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
- ^1 U5 F* {9 X& R1 Ichildren results in an increase in growth velocity and
K( z' ]7 \& D2 m# yadvanced bone age, as seen in our patient.' ]+ V! `( c) Y0 O+ y5 I
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during) t( ?" `8 i# M; q- c
early childhood on pubertal development and final" C$ v1 ?3 y' z2 a& m! L3 A) I
adult height are not fully known and always remain
5 Q x4 t) }& ~9 va concern. Children treated with short-term testos- v" L0 N+ V) I$ L+ ]! k5 n- m
terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
$ E4 Y9 r9 _: h5 ?. g/ l4 |acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
4 ~) U* r5 o icessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
2 x8 O1 ^3 S7 Z4 H+ c5 O; l% adecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9" q6 v3 s$ _7 Q
There are conflicting reports and controversy
9 Z4 m: x( f. O6 `: s6 d; E* cover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult1 B& X9 m+ \5 {
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal6 |( c- f2 T1 ~, v. Z6 d0 u
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
& D0 y8 s4 w, |6 B2 f6 K# Mulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,6 I5 ]5 \ q) b, o2 q
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
. G, y+ X6 D: j7 g' C" T) v schildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
( L) o0 f. t$ h: Mpenile length in clinical studies.$ W" ^; Z9 W4 {
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is1 x* Z+ W' ?$ ]( g. d
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
2 z% n0 R' e4 ytestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because% u" k7 `- t. D- F4 d" T2 G/ d
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.% Q. [. j) P1 f3 @
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
! y3 M1 `% e; R' odiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at+ k7 g7 S- J7 I! _& @! F
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
+ k0 K& J' @! oheight will not be affected.. x3 _. s3 r; T' `- I( o r
Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-6 M( ?6 z9 }8 w" `" F+ C
ability of androgen products in our society may" r! i0 c* M- Y) T1 u; [
indeed cause more virilization in male or female
$ L8 A* m1 |# K9 O- Rchildren than one would realize. Exposure to andro-
# p& a/ F& F' Lgen products must be considered and specific ques-+ M- I% Z! m+ m5 g6 z4 K
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
% q/ ~' @( [4 X. o6 cgel should be asked of the family members during
! c3 \+ a( ?* b! P4 ]8 z/ Zthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-8 @3 ]3 t3 T5 i6 W; ~3 I
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-- a9 E, k3 y' ^( O: ?
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by C+ x! V5 J) P2 E" E
appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
9 I U, O' B# j2 w) ~* Uhistory, or failure to ask the specific questions, may& U0 Z( m" p" I+ G& k* A, [
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
& j* Z5 V; j+ M# `; dinvestigation. The primary care physician should be( I( v% b9 n% a2 A$ m% [! r" f4 K
aware of this fact, because most of these children4 \+ O8 Z& K4 I+ z
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
6 `0 _# \2 }! l# lDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
7 z8 v7 f& i, @0 {7 {5 h/ Mwarning about the virilizing effect on a male or
+ j0 R! r! M9 jfemale child who might come in contact with some-& T) a# c4 ^ S2 Y1 @7 T
one using any of these products.
2 {' o& I4 Z, m) Q6 w0 o* `References+ L; D. h: v9 y/ q
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation7 f- ]1 u$ J4 E- H
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
2 S! E6 A2 g' P' N7 eEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;4 {3 u( v E0 d3 i& \& G
2002: 565-628.
1 g3 \4 M" y& p w0 u9 g1 W# a2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
( j9 l9 B. y0 H; u4 ~% }puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|