- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old
( P5 w, N' }1 U* ^% b' W! {* [Boy Induced by Indirect Topical
7 v) h& j( E8 [5 `! S7 S+ l8 fExposure to Testosterone) O$ u* r. ~# J% v: B8 x0 v
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,2
( V, J# E% @% Z1 K5 j2 ^and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
( h6 [$ Q. `% QClinical Pediatrics* i J' H$ S+ T
Volume 46 Number 6
' m- \) m! [9 ]# }' tJuly 2007 540-543$ y* Z. K" E4 _+ E& H+ ^, l
© 2007 Sage Publications
( K- v" Q# {7 r* F10.1177/0009922806296651! Z6 s! I E0 @/ ?
http://clp.sagepub.com
8 u% C7 E* q H m: D" z/ h0 Shosted at
3 W8 { @0 T, {; U$ k Qhttp://online.sagepub.com
6 i) h5 I6 s# _6 ^ U9 HPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,
* n5 ?8 g# Y9 V- k+ v% His a significant concern for physicians. Central
/ u) H. p( ]% }1 q. K$ dprecocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
5 ?1 v5 E' W8 P6 V" Fthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has* N7 u5 R7 b& `6 a
a higher incidence of organic central nervous system; |$ V7 k) ]9 o3 H1 X( S
lesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested% }) M [$ S& V6 Q( R/ c6 U
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic
7 q: C1 Z6 Q3 r+ ~hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-
7 c) D( J* {- l" D+ v3 q* Icles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
$ q" S! s! x" ?5 H% |$ R2 lreport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
9 T; o- B" i2 k- n1 V5 x5 h& kenlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-
3 |1 L/ P3 {2 e5 U3 Yment without testicular enlargement, which was due
7 C' ^2 G& c/ l. Q: a2 ~to the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
A( m' f a1 R+ Gthe father. The family initially concealed this infor-$ |6 M) h2 a3 P1 w) Z, _( {
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this
- a; ]$ K! B9 qchild. Given the widespread and easy availability of
) y$ P, M/ T/ U" P! m# i/ y6 F" {4 Qtestosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-
m1 H1 L: |, w6 S: ^7 A# C1 K. ebly more common than the rare case report in the( e7 T" O7 B. z' D; Z' N, J
literature.4* V& Z# O; F8 c
Patient Report- S1 O' J5 e3 }! A& i
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the
3 |6 C% H3 _! s# kendocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern7 p) \4 J" |0 R- s3 i& z
of early sexual development. His mother noticed
' l! y- v" i: e" Z7 m" clight colored pubic hair development when he was
8 l4 _+ Q" q- R" D2 }# E% t! lFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of! D% i9 |; F/ a
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
1 N* t! j8 L) S/ O' DAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,: M# F$ k8 K8 @2 W4 w
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
8 k, n% l7 s, r7 |' tMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;. X* w3 H! A* Q8 ]2 q$ P0 c
e-mail: [email protected].* K6 h7 h0 V* ~9 M b( Q/ V
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became
& F0 f: I0 c6 o9 \7 U' u: gdarker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
, d, D% m2 W. M0 p1 r2 D. ^1 ]ment of his penis and frequent erections. The child" _4 \0 ]' t; U0 `" ^
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with* ^7 k: w% _' D0 @/ Z ^2 \$ @2 u
a birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
/ i& x4 @1 M# p2 \) D! e% E4 K/ f+ X20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year* p) i( c1 H# X* T( V2 J7 A9 V
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with
, E7 F# X# l) Ssolid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
. a/ p# n2 J; `7 c+ m5 ?% Xand his psychosocial and psychomotor development* Q' {& l5 a* \ i
was age appropriate.
, ^6 s0 @8 u; N4 c0 QThe family history was remarkable for the father,
+ F; h/ g$ N4 K4 owho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,
/ p; L0 `9 O9 N9 i9 U' A' Vwhich was treated with thyroxine. The father’s0 Q' v" F2 T, C2 ]+ z
height was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat6 ~) u/ T6 h8 [7 p9 d+ C) c
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.
! G8 h; A H0 B# G# L% KThe father denied taking any other medication. The+ r" ~0 W Z: f
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche: n* e1 N4 o5 o: u7 \( _& S% b
was at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
5 N* x5 |9 H9 ~5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-
# ~, u: \ D" Q1 |# p& }0 _& hcocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
0 f7 @& [0 ~' T7 o9 ztives. There were no siblings.
- a$ J+ [" r& zPhysical Examination' o. B4 K( T7 O$ }/ Q
The physical examination revealed a very active,2 U v, D2 U# u
playful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented. }" |$ f! G8 _
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
+ J" x" x: h1 e7 d S90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg
& I7 _1 p4 _$ q1 F& l! x8 v(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth+ Z0 W, E$ p$ t' l Y5 I6 B# E& b
velocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of* L: j, i9 E4 L( Y* A
the neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.. J6 h# b5 f, H1 m* k$ ^8 t& p, r9 `8 `
The genitourinary examination was remarkable for
: [4 }( ?7 @# Z7 aenlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
1 _% e) L8 f7 d) E; I8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well( b+ t. O# U, e
developed. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around2 g5 |, `* J [' s: w
540
) ^& n$ G6 J# X8 o6 fat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
# F) x+ x% U) `2 i3 N) E5 lthe base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
2 q& y& ], P- Q( w$ ^! Ntesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.
, r3 h& y2 @4 CThe skin was moist and smooth and somewhat: ?8 g: R7 O: Y& q! x1 f q2 v
oily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no
. w# K. G* b) Z% S; s7 Mabnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
$ v: N y3 x( z- c2 j" iNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+' s& _ ]5 T, Y3 H% o, O
bilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion
1 M& X1 l; C" E. g5 X# }+ zof papilledema.- n! f8 A7 L9 }# J
Laboratory Evaluation
/ O% N* }- G3 h0 yThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
# P0 b% M+ U0 H% [% zusing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-" j q, c2 O& y9 E, ]
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal8 `5 _$ a1 k3 {" L% j/ Z- [4 b! _
karyotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
# d; S+ E: b; Q. ushowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-1 j- o, J: `" @
lating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).2 j7 r0 P0 j5 k. B
The concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood
; d' ~" F% o/ |urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were) H: u1 I$ p; Q" m
within normal range for his age. The concentration
- F4 _" N% I2 I) @of serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL
$ ? @1 D: Y+ s- C+ Y(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 20
2 |0 H+ I6 a# r7 q Z2 E, Vng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
6 m& \9 V; _. _' k- Pterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
0 \7 l1 Q1 f+ sdesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to) }1 P$ r$ Z/ o. o
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S): |) W. r& | O; t# d
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-3 [1 H5 \ i, J. y4 H
tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total$ m: ^' r. f. G4 J& |5 _+ a n& \
testosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
, J" [2 m# m9 p* ~and β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
7 g2 G- c4 |2 o# z+ |/ E7 G: @5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular
* i% |$ S- R! t4 l2 qstimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone. U' x' z- R/ N/ n1 a. B
concentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL1 Z; k- ]; C, s5 Z
(prepubertal).- X% d! l& }% i
The parents were notified about the laboratory
) m9 e4 j+ ?' jresults and were informed that all of the tests were& Q+ P) U% W4 ^" K
normal except the testosterone level was high. The' i5 }, z2 s) W. `
follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to' g6 H b6 [+ l/ m# t
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-: B, m0 `1 n7 s+ f, m
ever, the family did not return for 4 months.! o8 ]2 b4 t4 _. o. ^1 C7 X# n. a
Physical examination at this time revealed that the' ?% Y3 W. E2 O6 J
child had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained
4 Y# D9 J1 K9 E N2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained
( J) _/ ^) u! e. h: kunchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
+ ^8 Q' E$ p% G& }, I; xpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
9 x( I( C+ Q0 C, e% E/ Othe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2, o6 M5 S, C* @/ ?9 Q8 K
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged.
5 s: L7 b- r$ T D$ y; H! ~$ yThe mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-5 O/ t3 W, Z3 D1 K
ing frequent erections.' g4 T2 @, j2 H' D# J' Z4 Z7 {
Both parents were again questioned about use of3 C7 u. C! m% Q* g
any ointment/creams that they may have applied to$ I# b0 w! ?& T) h
the child’s skin. This time the father admitted the. s0 q* b( S; |4 ~- K5 A% D
Topical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541/ ?) ]- A. H5 t! u. U2 V# W) ?
use of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-9 _3 M3 b4 V: S: W' c, I
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for
! j" _: h) g, i3 k: Ka year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed% x9 D3 F/ n( P# Z0 e3 t
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
% G" J3 K1 f6 [* U- Xscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
# y1 G% r; f. A d9 A7 Vsecondary to depression.+ ^2 Y& F$ Q9 l6 Q; Y* P
The child slept in the same bed with parents./ y% S$ V6 Q+ g) p2 d" v
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
! K9 S7 E. [9 I3 i- x" T' tchest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-
2 @ ~6 E; u8 M9 {nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.8 D6 ?, y4 X( M" U; p$ a; y) U
The father also admitted that after the phone call,- q: n O, O- x& } k; B
when he learned the testosterone level in the baby' y' h4 u& U( k1 n3 N4 i _2 }
was high, he then read the product information4 A/ g$ `8 F; K* Y& Z
packet and concluded that it was most likely the rea-3 @( p" Z; Y6 E8 v( z9 T I
son for the child’s virilization. At that time, they j' Y4 K8 L% n. w
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the
, Q* G& x- a% ]6 m' H! N1 G! ofather was not hugging him with bare skin and had
; Z. A# _2 a7 x7 V' ~8 e" b X& ]been using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone
7 v3 ~; X7 ?" Vtest was ordered, but the family did not go to the
$ ^2 R& m- Q2 |6 Q' Glaboratory to obtain the test.. N. _: {: U1 l
Discussion
, e; v: @/ G3 c/ {+ S, r. C7 g [Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary+ d S( V( ]& Q/ v* E$ |
sexual development before 9 years of age.1,4. V) R8 r6 q- c
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when# F8 ~( j" K. y8 ]
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
( ^9 e/ I- N- m, \5 f1 z% tthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-
- e; Q2 c* g# J& x2 o/ @' S. pmon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP
1 d5 `; R2 D) T( n2 R$ B a1 R9 kmay have a central nervous system lesion that is( I" o' l1 r1 S9 |+ Q
responsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
* p6 _2 p$ t- v! famic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-' a% l0 Z0 r r5 J2 ^" d
sis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in) Y3 u# E5 X3 Y" V9 ~' p
boys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-
; k0 g, w# X* @# Dization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-
* g! j& R. D f$ c$ Rrical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by& _' h/ @( D2 m+ g4 a
gonadotropins.1,3- ]6 ~# o: P# d* l/ K
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco-
$ D; \: _9 _) U# ^. ?' _9 mcious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate! v0 Q! D( {" v8 v0 Z: [0 ?" M
androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or$ \# q( D b0 i Z) x& W
exogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-
# @; _5 T3 ]5 Iulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing, C# r/ h1 K+ ^7 q
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive
) c; ~ U3 E) C9 v6 F1 sadrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious, [* [! o3 Q V! J2 V; r
puberty in boys.3,4
! z* c5 f. ?1 C3 h# S; sThe most common form of congenital adrenal1 N% a7 D3 |. L6 g2 M% v }6 p
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.( x; |' ]( S* t0 {$ \
The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in2 v8 e1 Q+ h+ }0 B) ?0 m. V
excessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,
`$ i0 V/ Y$ z0 E- O4 G( n1 I/ ran adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
6 f B3 ~: |8 N0 K5 u1 pexcess.1,3% i0 ?- [3 Q9 k8 l$ V- _
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
$ E, ]- j5 h) i( d% E542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 2007
: u& m) f' r; f4 M0 _0 ZA unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-
; a: M I7 ^3 P! Sindependent precocious puberty, which is also known
, L. j- X, P) ]) R( \, W4 Y5 q$ Oas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a
* {& ^# _: W" }& c5 V- ?) Fvery young age. The physical findings in these boys3 [% h6 X1 _; o n; v6 r
with this disorder are full pubertal development,. [1 z6 a+ A6 E% d3 G
including bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
! F" _# ] t. C( a! a9 P! \0 ywith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder3 P" r/ ?$ X" y
are suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show# K: N) T5 b1 C- k
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-! d1 p7 u1 U& H
releasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked
% e# o1 O- p' T) i/ \3 {1 Rautosomal dominant disorder that affects only
0 J6 H( t3 M) s+ L6 }% T- J( X. v! ~males; therefore, other male members of the family; ~7 I, u$ g6 Q9 C3 n3 h
may have similar precocious puberty.3# s- F! z X3 k& T0 V
In our patient, physical examination was incon-9 ^; ]9 x( f. N, W; O
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-: G* t0 o8 C5 c# J% r! h4 q1 ^
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
: k: O' `9 k. s3 Wwas in the differential diagnosis because his father1 I' |3 V( |7 X9 o8 h
started puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,! p" k' M7 U) g" Q: j
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the
; [, m/ j1 ] [: B$ _beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-* B% g& F3 {7 |" w/ f/ r9 b8 a) [) i
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
( Y3 w- @, ~; T2 qbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,0 i) B1 Y1 n7 A* a$ v) {
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase" c. p8 [# i; V3 }1 j" @
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-( \2 d5 G5 `- a' ^5 W5 T
ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
, `$ e1 J% n8 u4 ?$ t2 E9 vThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly8 t- g% p2 f/ D1 r% Z6 A4 x
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because4 A! d( L" E4 F( Q, z' B" P
the physical examination revealed the complete disap-
: d7 S: g) Z, ypearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
: D) B& b4 ^, p/ Ddecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-7 k% e% A( R# t
terone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was
& l& L$ V$ h2 j2 q9 Musing it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’; H- ~6 e7 V6 t; w4 Z% ~7 H, N' _6 W6 J
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or" P8 A: h2 l; i( h3 R Q& s- ?
cream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to
4 u5 U/ j1 h9 @. ?# H1 f3 V+ xunprotected females through direct skin exposure.
; R# W8 V8 l: k v) t7 z) @Serum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the2 }1 k3 s6 s$ p) v0 L" A" F; K
baseline value in those females who were exposed to8 W& G: d, J( [) n% s$ K. s* t0 b
even 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male9 ^7 n W4 o. X) Z0 k/ K
partners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-, ~9 J! D W" H3 J; q
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.0 u8 p: K( @: u4 l. q! ?9 W( _
Our patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,% V, [9 C, @' y9 g
which was clearly high. Some studies suggest that
* d' v9 p* J d# N: Gdermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-& v5 E- V! h7 H$ \: k) s
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
7 h( c9 Q. i$ M, {" D8 I" n0 q2 nactive in young children exposed to testosterone
4 ^- e3 ?+ ?' Nexogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-# W' b( d2 U5 ~" _. ~1 x
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
7 x. H6 s# \1 T1 b- {5 O# r, ovirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
# O/ o$ Q0 Z4 q% C1 S3 Dchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and0 d. Y6 c8 F- D: R
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.$ s6 f6 ?6 `0 p0 c% ?! S. i
The long-term effect of androgen exposure during
6 u4 N3 F F3 ~3 X) B6 Oearly childhood on pubertal development and final
1 |* o7 G+ p8 f% T' L( Uadult height are not fully known and always remain; @# y( `. i7 R# G2 A
a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
5 w/ j( q8 i; Y. j; G( l+ M- Oterone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some
. E9 h# w5 Q! }5 k2 ]/ v4 iacceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after
, M- e, P: N P4 f4 @( Vcessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
V9 m. X+ }2 ^! }) Edecelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9
. F$ D$ A; P9 `9 Y" ZThere are conflicting reports and controversy
8 k5 ]# y- m7 E2 Qover the effect of early androgen exposure on adult( g; v! g9 F' Y) [ s
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal# K% c: X7 e8 H# B
adult penile length, apparently because of downreg-$ ^3 A1 V6 c5 a: ^9 ~
ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,+ a/ Q) Z t* _) D& k! F# \: b
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
& I- i( @) z$ B: `8 U( B8 Qchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult* W/ V* |/ H* i2 F* L
penile length in clinical studies.
" d& _: S( z: P5 Y, D5 }$ N7 x2 J7 NNonetheless, we do not believe our patient is5 r7 O$ ?+ P: v" J8 j( l" H$ s
going to experience any of the untoward effects from
X3 ~) g- r5 J9 T$ G# f% dtestosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because% i* t3 `' K$ c. Q+ t' b
the exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.8 ]2 \4 I7 ]5 D8 o0 f9 f3 p' d$ i
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of
0 [% @# G* `% s, J# ndiagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at' _% B3 h4 q; o- [0 x) Q3 n; d, ^
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult
. {3 w1 |8 [4 {height will not be affected.
& i; c I9 A+ `+ ]( p2 `, n; AAlthough rarely reported, the widespread avail-1 b& A2 M7 L9 I1 f" }
ability of androgen products in our society may
) h [& C+ d" ^indeed cause more virilization in male or female9 @3 h" T- ~- \- U- H7 f/ D
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-; w' U9 ` u n% Y1 ~) A
gen products must be considered and specific ques-/ f- @1 R" ?+ {! A- q: l
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or ?2 ]$ x% }8 H
gel should be asked of the family members during
' b! Z/ i) n: e; A4 _& `1 `the evaluation of any children who present with vir-5 d- W6 }8 E3 M1 K$ W, i9 ~' W
ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-; U* Y B. O2 y
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
3 p0 _% M/ b$ S1 C- U) r% \appropriate history. The inability to obtain such a$ X" |* k8 m6 F
history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may9 ?( v% P- s y5 v+ Z0 e( l' [0 e
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive
8 [* Q$ _5 _6 z) K; Q7 q0 B( ~9 minvestigation. The primary care physician should be
5 _, f+ t* k) _6 `; U2 qaware of this fact, because most of these children4 z( C: Q4 }) y5 d
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’0 B$ }5 {" H& Y" G% z6 v8 r! j* ?
Desk Reference and package insert should also put a8 f. ^ [% H2 N3 T" L
warning about the virilizing effect on a male or
3 }5 d0 n6 d6 _; `7 ]" L5 x0 Xfemale child who might come in contact with some-/ z6 y: v8 L# Y- m! W2 w2 ]
one using any of these products.
3 b- q/ D' T# r7 c! oReferences
" o* \. V: h/ ]$ n k) ]1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation0 e$ Q, y* _6 {' P0 u, x
and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric
1 L& q! E4 ^( [& P' gEndocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;" u6 ?; |+ d) D/ j7 F+ f
2002: 565-628.
) J9 n1 |0 \' b, t2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious) z: ]0 U3 F/ d) a: s+ w
puberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|